Scientists' Role in Public Policy: Expert Judgment and Environmental Change

Explore the complex relationship between scientific expertise and public policy in this AGU Fall Meeting lecture. Delve into the challenges scientists face when engaging in public debates, examining the roles of generalists and experts. Analyze Snow's theory and the limitations of scientific knowledge in policy-making. Investigate various approaches for scientists to participate in public discourse, including taking sides, making political endorsements, and maintaining objectivity. Learn about the importance of expert judgment, the role of the IPCC, and strategies for effectively communicating scientific findings. Gain insights on maintaining perspective, leveraging diverse expertise, and managing time efficiently when involved in policy discussions. Understand the potential consequences of public engagement and receive valuable advice for scientists navigating the complex landscape of science and policy.

Introduction
Roadmap
Generalist vs Expert
Snows Theory
Limitations of Science
Involvement in the Public Debate
Questions
Climategate
Individual Responsibility
Option 1 Publicly Take Sides
Option 2 Political Endorsements
Option 3 Political Endorsements
My Ground Rule
Take Both Sides
Scientists Do It All The Time
Ground Rule
Expert Judgement
I did my homework
Intermediate steps
IPCC
The Fifth Option
Maintaining Perspective
Other Expertise
Use Your Time Efficiently
Expect to Be vilified
Steves Advice